Algunos temas tratados, además de los señalados por las Etiquetas, son los siguientes: Biggest Secret Of Masonry; Sexual Vampirism in Masonry; Sexual Vampirism in Illuminism; Sexual Vampirism with children to Steal their energy to live forever; Masonería es una Religión; Mafia y Masonería dan mucha caridad; Mafia construyó muchos hospitales en Estados Unidos; Conexiones entre Catolicismo y Masonería; Símbolos en común entre Catolicismo y Masonería; Cleopatra's Needle; Secret Symbols; Sexual Symbols; Conexiones entre Masonería y Mormonismo; Templos y Rituales mormones; Rituales iguales entre Masonería y Mormonismo; Símbolos iguales entre Masonería y Mormonismo; Conexiones entre Masonería y la Nueva Era; Universalismo; Theosophical Society; Mujeres en la Masonería; Shriners of North America; Megapolis Omen; Dionysian Artificers; Formas Trapezoides para atraer espíritus y hacer efectiva Magia Negra; John Hancock Tower; Washington full of Masonic Symbols in the streets; Edificios Malditos & Consagrarlos para salvarlos; Skull And Bones rituals & influence; Bush & Kerry son Skull And Bones; Religión Católica no es Cristianismo; Idolatría en la Religión Católica; En el Seminario le dijeron que tenía que ser un Brujo para tener los poderes de Jesús; Luck es Lucifer;
VÍDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr4ehyLou10
Texto adjunto:
Categoría
Licencia
Licencia de YouTube estándar























































































16 comments:
thanks so much for putting this together
ONE LOVE
But jeesh it's a strong drug ..
excellent visuals though.
It's funny but I was working on mini explanations for a good portion of his archived photos!
Great Post Eric. Maybe you could explain to the others how Zionism is intertwined with some of the specific societies such as the Jesuits, Masons and the unamned Western European ellites.
It is tough for some to connect those dots without sounding like an anti-semetic, nazi loving troll. Big difference between your traditionial Jews and the Zionists from the early 20th century.
It's OK when YOU do it, because you're right, right?
Our definitions of "propaganda" are obviously different as we've discussed before. But note that these governments and corporations that Edward Bernays (Author of "Propaganda") worked for, they were knowingly lying in an effort to brainwash people. David Dees and myself are just using creativity through visual art or the written word to express our truths to people. These are fundamentally different actions/intentions, and your insistence on labeling them both as "propaganda" is where your confusion is coming from.
Just look around you and pay attention.
and you is that they have power
and you do not."
--------------------------------
WRONG!
Yes he does, he has us and we are
MILLIONS.
By definition the humanity's true
power rest on the people and not
on the "rulers".
Vic
Germany
And that makes it OK to cherry-pick facts and Photoshop images? The methods you use matter, regardless of how pure your intentions may be. To miss that point is to miss the lessons of history's dictators.
I do not think that Eric or David intend to mislead people; far from it, I think they intend to convince people of the truth as they see it. The error is in believing that you can do whatever you want to in order to effect that change.
Cherry-picking facts and photoshopping Barack Obama and George Bush in demonic rituals pretty clearly crosses the line from education to propaganda, and frankly I have a hard time buying that anyone doing it doesn't realize that. All it takes is to imagine (or witness first-hand) the other side doing what you do and realizing what your reaction would be. I don't buy the argument of that Mason who was here a few years back of the "disease of stupidity" - these are probably fairly smart guys. I think they know exactly what they're doing.
That makes it worse, not better.
But, but, but they are PHOTOSHOPPED!
they are SUPPOSED to be far feched,
cherry-picked, exagerated and
silly, that's the whole point.
The author (don't know who he is)
is cynically and sacastically
using their own methods "against"
"them", and that's the whole joke,
duh.
Nobody is misleading anyone here!
Your achilles heel seems to be
that you underestimate ppl, a lot,
people are not as stupid as you may
think they are, most can damn well
think for themselves and come to
their own conclusions, eventually with time, and trial and error,
all of us will figure out where we
were right and where not so much.
I suggest you to start your own blog,
your own way, write your own book,
do your own reaserch, interviews,
pieces and reports & put them out
there, let's see what ppl think
and specially let's see how you
deal with trolls.
L8r, Vic
P.S. I won't be back here to answer.
Doesn't sound to me like it's intended to be "far-fetched." Such tactics are also used throughout the regular programming around here. If this were an isolated case, I would be more inclined to agree with you.
I don't think that I underestimate people in this respect - it's been proven time and again that exposure to content (on the teevee for example) has a much greater effect on one's thought than we'd like to believe. Propaganda tends to be more effective than we think it will be, which I suppose is part of why it's so effective!
If you want to support him, buy his book!