A History of the C.I.A.

Fuente:

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/09/history-of-cia.html

Información:

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2012

A History of the C.I.A.

“I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo.” -USPresident Harry S. Truman, 1961

  

The CIA, the NSA, the FBI and all other three-letter, intelligence-gathering, secret-keeping agencies mimic and are modeled after secret societies. They gather and filter information by compartmentalizing the organization in a pyramid-like hierarchical structure keeping everyone but the elite on a need-to-know basis. The CIA was born from the WWII intelligence arm, the OSS (Office of Strategic Services), and was funded into permanence by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, which donated $34million 1945-48 alone. Nearly every person instrumental in the creation of the CIA was already a member of the CFR, including theRockefellers and Dulles brothers.

In 1945 when the CIA was still the OSS, they began Operation Paperclip which brought over 700 Nazi scientists directly into the forming CIA, NSA, and other high-level government organizations. Since it was illegal to even allow these Nazis into the US, let alone into top-secret government agencies, the CIA convinced the Vatican to issue American passports for these 700+ Nazi scientists under the pretense that it was to keep them out of the hands of the Russians.

“After WWII ended in 1945, victorious Russian and American intelligence teams began a treasure hunt throughout occupied Germany for military and scientific booty. They were looking forthings like new rocket and aircraft designs, medicines, and electronics. But they were also hunting down the most precious ‘spoils’ of all: the scientists whose work had nearly won the war for Germany. The engineers and intelligence officers of the Nazi War Machine. Following the discovery of flying discs (foo-fighters),particle/laser beam weaponry in German military bases, the War Department decided that NASA and the CIA must control this technology, and the Nazi engineers that had worked on this technology. There was only one problem: it was illegal. U.S. law explicitly prohibited Nazi officials from immigrating to America--and as many as three-quarters of the scientists in question had been committed Nazis.” -Operation Paperclip Casefile: New World Order and Nazi Germany

Hundreds of Nazi mind-control specialists and doctors who performed horrific experiments on prisoners instantly had their atrocious German histories erased and were promoted into high-level American jobs. Kurt Blome, for instance, was a high-ranking Nazi scientist who experimented with plague vaccines on concentration camp prisoners.He was hired by the U.S. Army Chemical Corps to work on chemical warfare projects. Major General Walter Schreiber was a head doctor during Nazi concentration camp prisoner experiments in which they starved, and otherwise tortured the inmates. He was hired by the Air Force School of Medicine in Texas. Werner Von Braun was technical director of the Nazi Peenemunde Rocket Research Center, where the Germans developed the V2 rocket. He was hired by the U.S. Army to develop guided missiles and then made the first director of NASA!

“Military Intelligence ‘cleansed’ the files of Nazi references. By 1955, more than 760 German scientists had been granted citizenship in the U.S. and given prominent positions in the American scientificcommunity. Many had been longtime members of the Nazi party and the Gestapo, had conducted experiments on humans at concentration camps, had used slave labor, and had committed other war crimes. In a 1985 expose in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Linda Hunt wrote that she had examined more than 130 reports on Project Paperclip subjects - and every one ‘had been changed to eliminate the security threat classification.’ A good example of how these dossiers were changed is the case of Werner von Braun. A September 18, 1947, report on the German rocket scientist stated, ‘Subject is regarded as a potential security threat by the Military Governor.’ The following February, a new security evaluation of Von Braun said, ‘No derogatory information is available on the subject … It is the opinion of the Military Governor that he may not constitute a security threat to the United States.’” -Operation Paperclip Casefile: New World Order and Nazi Germany 

Shortly after Operation Paperclip came Operation Mockingbird, during which the CIA trained reporters and created media outlets to disseminate their propaganda. One of Project Mockingbird’s lead roles was played by Philip Graham who would become publisher of The Washington Post. Declassified documents admit that over 25 organizations and 400 journalists became CIA assets which now include major names like ABC, NBC, CBS, AP, Reuters, Time, Newsweek and more.

In 1953 the Iranian coup classified as Operation AJAX was the CIA’s first successful overthrow of a foreign government. In 1951 Iran Parliament and Prime Minister Dr. Mohammed Mosaddeq voted for nationalizing their oil industry which upset western oil barons like the Rockefellers. On April 4^th, 1953, CIA director Allen Dulles transferred $1 million to Iranian General Fazlollah Zahedi to be used “in any way that would bring about the fall of Mosaddeq.” Coup leaders first planted anti-Mosaddeq propaganda throughout the Iranian press, held demonstrations, and bribed officials. Then they began committing terror attacks to blame on Mosaddeq hoping to bring public sentiment away from their hero. They machine-gunned civilians, bombed mosques, and then passed out pamphlets saying, “Up with Mosaddeq, up with Communism, down with Allah.” Zahedi’s coup took place between August 15^th and 19^th after which the CIA sent $5 million more for helping their new government consolidate power. Soon America controlled half of Iran’s oil production and American weapons merchants moved in making almost $20 billion off Iran in the next 20 years. 

“In 1953 the Central Intelligence Agency working in tandem with MI6 overthrew the democratically-elected leader of Iran Dr. Mohammed Mosaddeq. Mosaddeq had been educated in the west, was pro-America, and had driven communist forces out of the north of his country shortly after being elected in 1951. Mosaddeq then nationalized the oil fields and denied British Petroleum a monopoly. The CIA’s own history department at cia.gov details how U.S. and British intelligence agents carried out terror attacks and then subsequently blamed them on Mosaddeq … The provocations included propaganda, demonstrations, bribery, agents of influence, and false flag operations. They bombed the home of a prominent religious leader and blamed it on Moseddeq. They attacked mosques, machine-gunned crowds, and then handed out thousands of handbills claiming that Moseddeq had done it … Dr. Mohammed Moseddeq, who was incarcerated for the duration of his life, fared better than any of his ministers who were executed just days after the successful coup for crimes that MI6 and the CIA had committed.” -Alex Jones, “Terrorstorm” DVD

In 1954 the CIA performed its second coup d’etat overthrow of a foreign democracy; this time it was Guatemala, whose popular leader Jacobo ArbenzGuzman, had recently nationalized 1.5 million acres of land for the peasants. Before this, only 2.2% of Guatemala’s land-owners owned 70% of the land, which included that of United Fruit Co. whose board of directors were friends with the Dulles brothers and wanted to keep Guatemala a banana republic. So once again the CIA sent in propagandists and mercenaries, trained militia groups, bombed the capital, and installed their puppet dictator Castillo Armas, who the gave United Fruit Co. and the other 2.2% land-owners everything back. Military dictators ruled Guatemala for the next 30 years killing over 100,000 citizens. Guatemalan coroners were reported saying they could not keep up with the bodies. The CIA called it Operation Success.

“The CIA has overthrown functioning democracies in over twenty countries.” -John Stockwell, former CIA official

They always follow the same strategy. First, globalist interests are threatened by a popular or democratically elected foreign leader; leaders who help their populations nationalize foreign-owned industries, protect workers, redistribute wealth/land and other such actions loved by the lower and middle-class majority, hated by the super-rich minority. Next, the CIA identifies and co-operates with opposition militia groups within the country, promising them political power in trade for American business freedom. Then they are hired, trained and funded to overthrow the current administration through propaganda, rigged elections, blackmail, infiltration/disruption of opposition parties, intimidation, torture, economic sabotage, death squads and assassinations. Eventually the CIA-backed militia group stages a coup and installs their corporate sympathizer-dictator and the former leaders are propagated as having been radicals or communists and the rest of the world is taught to shrug and view American imperialism as necessary world policing. The CIA has now evolved this whole racket into a careful science which they teach at the infamous “School of the Americas.” They also publish books like “The Freedom Fighter’s Manual” and “The Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual” teaching methods of torture, blackmail, interrogation, propaganda and sabotage to foreign military officials.

Starting in 1954 the CIA ran operations attempting to overthrow the communist North Vietnamese government, while supporting the Ngo Dinh Diem regime in South Vietnam. From 1957-1973 the CIA conducted what has been termed “The Secret War” in Laos during which they carried out almost one coup per year in an effort to overthrow their democracy. After several unsuccessful attempts, the US began a bombing campaign, dropping more explosives and planting more landmines on Laos during this Secret War than during all of World War II. Untold thousands died and a quarter of the Laotian people became refugees often living in caves. Right up to the present, Laotians are killed/maimed almost daily from unexploded landmines. In 1959 the US helped install “Papa Doc” Duvalier, the Haitian dictator whose factions killed over 100,000. In 1961 CIA Operation Mongoose attempted and failed to overthrow Fidel Castro. Also in 1961 the CIA assassinated the Dominican Republic’s leader Rafael Trujillo, assassinated Zaire’s democratically-elected Patrice Lumumba, and staged a coup against Ecuador’s President Jose Velasco, after which US President JFK fired CIA director Allen Dulles. In 1963 the CIA was back in the Dominican Republic and Ecuador performing military coups overthrowing Juan Bosch and President Arosemana. In 1964 another CIA-funded/armed coup overthrew Brazil’s democratically-elected Joao Goulart replacing him with Dictator General Castelo Branco, CIA-trained secret police, and marauding death squads. In 1965 the CIA performed coups in Indonesia and Zaire and installed oppressive military dictators; General Suharto in Indonesia would then go on to slaughter nearly a million of his countrymen. In 1967 a CIA-backed coup overthrew the government of Greece. In 1968 they helped capture Che Guevara in Bolivia. In 1970 they overthrew Cambodia’s popular Prince Sahounek, an action that greatly strengthened the once minor opposition Khmer Rouge party who went on to murder millions.In 1971 they backed a coup in Bolivia and installed Dictator Hugo Banzer who went on torture and murder over 2000 of his political opponents. In 1973 they assassinated Chile’s democratically-elected Salvador Allende and replaced him with General Augusto Pinochet who murdered thousands of his civilians. On and on it goes; The Association for Responsible Dissent put out a report estimating that by 1987, 6 million people worldwide had died resulting from CIA covert ops. Since then there have been many untold millions more.

“Throughout the world, on any given day, a man, woman or child is likely to be displaced, tortured, killed or disappeared, at the hands of governments or armed political groups. More often than not, the United States shares the blame.” -Amnesty International annual report on U.S. Military aid and human rights, 1996

1979-1989 CIA Operation Cyclone, with joint funding from Britain’s MI6, heavily armed and trained over 100,000 Afghani Mujahideen (“holy warriors”) during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. With the help of the Pakistani ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence), billions of dollars were given to create this Islamic army. Selig Harrison from the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars stated, “The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan. The US provided $3 billion [now many more billion] for building up these Islamic groups, and it accepted Pakistan’s demand that they should decide how this money should be spent … Today that money and those weapons have helped build up the Taliban … [who] are now making a living out of terrorism.”

Perhaps as Harrison stated, the CIA “made a historic mistake” in creating these Jihadists, or perhaps they knew exactly what they were doing. Recently declassified DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) documents prove that the US government was long aware of the ISI’s sponsorship/creation of both the Taliban and Al Qaeda

“The United States has been part and parcel to supporting the Taliban all along, and still is let me add … You have a military government in Pakistan now that is arming the Taliban to the teeth … Let me note; that [US] aid has always gone to Taliban areas … And when people from the outside try to put aid into areas not controlled by the Taliban, they are thwarted by our own State Department … Pakistan [has] initiated a major resupply effort, which eventually saw the defeat, and caused the defeat, of almost all of the anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan.” -Congressional Rep. Dana Rohrbacher, the House International Relations Committee on Global Terrorism and South Asia, 2000

British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook stated before the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not actually a terrorist group, but a database of international Mujahadden and arms dealers/smugglers used by the CIA to funnel arms, money, and guerrillas. The word “Al Qaeda” itself literally translates to “the database.” Not only did the CIA create the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, they continued funding them right up to the 9/11 attacks blamed on them. For example, four months prior to 9/11, in May, 2001, Colin Powell gave another $43 million in aid to the Taliban.

“Not even the corporate US media could whitewash these facts and so explained it away by alleging that US officials had sought cooperation from Pakistan because it was the original backer of the Taliban, the hard-line Islamic leadership of Afghanistan accused by Washington of harboring Bin Laden. Then the so called ‘missing link’ came when it was revealed that the head of the ISI was the principal financier of the 9/11 hijackers ... Pakistan and the ISI is the go between of the global terror explosion. Pakistan's military-intelligence apparatus, which literally created and sponsored the Taliban and Al Qaeda, is directly upheld and funded by the CIA. These facts are not even in dispute, neither in the media nor in government. Therefore when we are told by the neocon heads of the new world order that they are doing everything in their power to dismantle the global terror network what we are hearing is the exact opposite of the truth. They assembled it, they sponsored it and they continue to fund it. As any good criminal should, they have a middleman to provide plausible deniability, that middleman is the ISI and the military dictatorship of Pakistan.” -Steve Watson, “U.S. Intel Officer: Al Qaeda Leadership Allowed to Operate Freely” (http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2007/160707ISI.htm)

Major Pierre-Henri Bunel, a French military intelligence agent, who was framed and convicted no doubt for daring to raise his voice in December, 2001, said, “The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaeda. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the devil only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money.”(http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3836) 

In a late 1980’s Newsweek article, outspoken opponent of President Bush and recently assassinated Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, told George Bush Sr., “you are creating a Frankenstein,” concerning the growing Islamist movement. She also came out in 2007 to say that Osama Bin Laden was already long dead having been murdered by Omar Sheikh. She was murdered herself a month after the interview, only two weeks before the Pakistani 2008 general elections.

Buy The Atlantean Conspiracy Now

Leer más»

Agenda 21: Conspiracy Theory or Real Threat?

Fuente:

http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2011/07/02/agenda_21_conspiracy_theory_or_real_threat/page/full/

Información:

Americans are so focused on Congress and Obama at the federal level of government right now that most are overlooking the socialism creeping in at the local level through Agenda 21. It is easy to overlook local government since people are saturated with too much information in the internet age. Compounding this is the fact that Agenda 21 is a dull topic, and it becomes understandable how it has been able to fly mostly under the radar since 1992, slowly working its way into our cities and counties.

Agenda 21, which reportedly means an agenda for the 21st century, is a United Nations program launched in 1992 for the vague purpose of achieving global "sustainable development." Congress never approved Agenda 21, although Presidents Obama, Clinton and George H.W. Bush have all signed Executive Orders implementing it. 178 other world leaders agreed to it in 1992 at the Rio Summit. Since then, the U.N. has mostly bypassed national governments, using Agenda 21’s International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (“ICLEI”) to make agreements directly with local governments. ICLEI's U.S. presence has grown to include agreements with over 600 cities, towns and counties here, which are now copying the land use plans prescribed in Agenda 21.

Some conservatives are trying to attract attention to Agenda 21 by labeling it a secret conspiracy to create a one world government. While that will wake some people up, it will turn off others. It does not matter whether it is a conspiracy or not. There are people on the left side of the political spectrum - who may even believe they have good intentions - working together to spread their vision for society worldwide. Whether they meet in dark rooms or openly in public meetings is irrelevant; they are having great success convincing local governments in the U.S. to adopt their socialist and extreme environmentalist programs under the guise of feel-good buzz words. Left wing billionaire George Soros's Open Society has provided $2,147,415 to ICLEI. Van Jones' Green for All and the Tides Foundations’ Apollo Alliance are also reportedly ICLEI contributors.

Agenda 21 ostensibly seeks to promote "sustainability" (the latest revisionist word for "environmentalism," since Americans have learned too many negative things about environmentalism). "Sustainability" is an amorphous concept that can be interpreted to an extreme degree that would regulate and restrict many parts of our lives. When will the level of carbon emissions be low enough? How much must we reduce our consumption of fossil fuels? Preserving the environment is a dubious science, and what steps are really necessary to protect the environment are anyone's guess.

Agenda 21 promotes European socialist goals that will erode our freedoms and liberties. Most of its vague, lofty sounding phrases cause the average person’s eyes to glaze over, making it easier to sneak into our communities. The environmentalist goals include atmospheric protection, combating pollution, protecting fragile environments, and conserving biological diversity. Agenda 21 goes well beyond environmentalism. Other broad goals include combating poverty, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, and reducing private property ownership, single-family homes, private car ownership, and privately owned farms. It seeks to cram people into small livable areas and institute population control. There is a plan for “social justice” that will redistribute wealth.

Once these vague, overly broad goals are adopted, they are being interpreted to allow massive amounts of new, overreaching regulations. Joyce Morrison from Eco-logic Powerhouse says Agenda 21 is so broad it will affect the way we "live, eat, learn and communicate." Berit Kjos, author of Brave New Schools, warns that Agenda 21 "regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system." Even one of the authors of Agenda 21 has admitted that it "…calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…" These steps are already being enacted little by little at the local levels.

Since the U.S. is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, and uses more energy than any other country, it stands to lose the most from environmental regulations. The goal of "sustainability," which comes down to using government to heavy-handedly accomplish vague goals of caring for the earth, goes contrary to our free market capitalism. Even more unfair, struggling third world countries and communist countries that cannot financially afford to comply with the onerous environmental regulations will continue their high levels of fossil fuel consumption, and the U.S. will be forced by U.N. regulators to conserve even more to make up for those countries.

Obama signed Executive Order 13575 earlier this month, establishing a "White House Rural Council" prescribed by Agenda 21. The amount of government Obama has directed to administer this is staggering. Obama committed thousands of federal employees in 25 federal agencies to promote sustainability in rural areas, completely bypassing Congressional approval. Some of these agencies are unrelated to rural areas. The agencies will entice local communities into adopting Agenda 21 programs by providing them millions of dollars in grants. Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh writing for Canada Free Press analyzed the order and wrote, "it establishes unchecked federal control into rural America in education, food supply, land use, water use, recreation, property, energy, and the lives of 16% of the U.S. population."

Tea party groups, talk show host Glenn Beck, and organizations like Freedom Advocates, Catholic Investigative Agency and Sovereignty International are working hard to expose Agenda 21, but there is only so much a few can do. Some local governments have become aware of what Agenda 21 is really about and dropped out of ICLEI this year. The Carroll County Board of Commissioners, Montgomery County in Pennsylvania and the city of Edmond, Oklahoma have all withdrawn their participation.

It will be difficult to defeat Agenda 21 because it requires changing the attitudes of over 600 separate localities across the U.S. Ideally, a conservative president could roll back the executive orders implementing it, but considering Republican President H.W. Bush was a disappointment in this area that may be too much to hope for. If Republicans take over Congress they could challenge the huge power grab Obama made with Executive Order 13575 and ban Agenda 21 in the U.S. For now, local activists must champion this issue, much like Texans for Accountable Government has done, educating local boards and commissions and serving on them. Agenda 21 is a tedious and overwhelming topic, and until it can be explained in an easy-to-understand way that interests the average American, it will be tough to beat back.

Leer más»

Fuente:

http://enfoquelibre.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/agenda-21-%C2%BFteoria-de-la-conspiracion-o-amenaza-real/

Información:

Agenda 21: ¿Teoría de la Conspiración o Amenaza Real?

Posted on julio 26, 2011 

 Los estadounidenses están ahora tan enfocados en el  Congreso y Obama a nivel del Gobierno federal que la mayoría no nota el socialismo que viene arrastrándose a nivel del gobierno local a través del programa Agenda 21. Es fácil pasar por alto al gobierno local ya que las personas están saturadas con demasiada información en la era de internet. El tema viene a agravarse debido a que Agenda 21 es un tema aburrido, resultando comprensible como ha sido capaz de volar en su mayor parte bajo el radar desde 1992, lentamente trabajando su camino en nuestras ciudades y condados.

 Agenda 21, que al parecer significa una agenda para el siglo XXI, es un programa que las Naciones Unidas pusieron en marcha en 1992 con un vago propósito global el “Desarrollo Sostenible”.

El Congreso nunca aprobó del Agenda 21, aunque los presidentes Obama, Clinton y George H. Bush firmaron órdenes ejecutivas para su implementación. Otros 178 líderes del mundo  en la Cumbre de Río en 1992 lo acordaron. Desde entonces, la ONU utilizando principalmente Consejo Internacional de iniciativas ambientales de la Agenda 21 (“ICLEI”) ha evitado los gobiernos nacionales, para hacer acuerdos directamente con los gobiernos locales. La presencia de ICLEI ha crecido en Estados Unidos incluyendo acuerdos con más de 600 ciudades y condados, que ahora se están copiando los planes prescritos en Agenda 21 para el uso de la tierra.  

Rojo: No uso Humano. Amarillo: Altamente Reguladas. Negro: Asentamientos Humanos

Algunos conservadores están tratando de atraer la atención hacia Agenda 21 por lo etiquetadora como  una conspiración secreta para crear un solo Gobierno Mundial. Mientras esto despertará a algunas personas, otras seguirán dormidas. No importa si es una conspiración o no. Hay gente a la izquierda del espectro político – que pueden e incluso creen que tienen buenas intenciones – trabajando juntos para difundir su visión para la sociedad mundial. Si se reúnen en habitaciones oscuras o abiertamente en reuniones públicas es irrelevante; están teniendo gran éxito en convencer a los gobiernos locales en los Estados Unidos en adoptar sus programas socialistas y ambientalista extremo bajo el disfraz de buenas palabras de moda para sentirse bien.  La izquierdista Sociedad Abierta del  mil-millonario George Soros ha proporcionado $2,147,415  a ICLEI. Van Jones con “Verde para Todos” (Green for All)  y La Fundación para las Mareas “Alianza Apolo”  (Apollo Alliance) también son reportados colaboradores de ICLEI.

 Agenda 21 aparentemente busca promover la “sostenibilidad” (la última palabra revisionista para “ecologismo” y es que ya los estadounidenses han aprendido muchas cosas negativas sobre el Ecologismo. “Sostenibilidad” es un concepto amorfo que puede ser interpretado a un grado extremo, para regular y restringir muchas partes de nuestras vidas. ¿Cuándo estará lo suficientemente bajo el nivel de emisiones de carbono? ¿Cuánto debemos reducir nuestro consumo de combustibles fósiles? La conservación del medio ambiente es una ciencia discutible en la que solo se suponen, las medidas realmente  necesarias para proteger el medio ambiente.

Agenda 21 promueve los objetivos socialistas europeos que erosionan nuestras libertades tanto individuales así también como país. La mayoría de sus frases son vagamente nobles causando en los ojos de la persona promedio un brillo en los ojos, lo que permite colarse más fácilmente en nuestras comunidades. Los objetivos ambientalistas incluyen protección atmosférica, la lucha contra la contaminación, protección de entornos frágiles y conservación de la diversidad biológica.  Agenda 21 se va más allá de ecologismo. Otras metas generales incluyen la lucha contra la pobreza, cambiar las pautas de consumo, promoción de la salud y reducir la propiedad privada, casas unifamiliares, propiedad de coche privado y granjas de propiedad privada. Busca atiborrar a las personas en pequeñas zonas habitables e instituir el control de la población. Existe un plan de “justicia social” que se redistribuya la riqueza.

Control de la Población

Una vez que se adopten estos vagos y demasiado amplios objetivos, serán interpretados  para permitir grandes cantidades de nuevos y apresurados reglamentos. Joyce Morrison de Powerhouse Eco-lógica dice que Agenda 21 es tan amplia que afectará nuestra forma de “vivir, comer, aprender y comunicarse.” Berit Kjos, autor de “La Valiente Nueva Escuela”, advierte que Agenda 21 “Regularía y  limitaría severamente,  agua, electricidad y transporte – incluso negara el acceso humano a nuestros espacios naturales más preciados, supervisaría todas las tierras y personas. Nadie estaría libre de la atenta mirada del nuevo sistema mundial de información y seguimiento. “Incluso uno de los autores del Agenda 21 ha admitido a que  “esto… llama a cambios específicos en las actividades para toda persona “… “Estos pasos ya están siendo aprobados poco a poco a nivel local”.

Dado que Estados Unidos es uno de los países más ricos del mundo y utiliza más energíaque cualquier otro país, también será el que más pierda por la regulación ambiental. El objetivo de la  ”sostenibilidad”, es el de utilizar el Gobierno para lograr manipular severamente el imprecisos objetivos de cuidar de la tierra, esto es contrario a nuestro capitalismo de libre mercado. Incluso más injusto aun, los países del tercer mundo y los países comunistas que se esforzándose económicamente no pueden cumplir con las onerosas normas ambientales, continuarán sus altos niveles de consumo de combustibles fósiles, y Estados Unidos se verán obligados por las regulaciones de la ONU a ahorrar aún más para compensar a esos países.

Obama firmó la orden ejecutiva 13575 a principios de este mes para establecer a un “Consejo Rural Casa Blanca” prescrito por Agenda 21. La cantidad de Gobierno que Obama ha dirigido para administrar esto es asombrosa. Obama ha comprometido miles de empleados federales en 25 agencias para promover la sostenibilidad en las zonas rurales, omitiendo completamente la aprobación del Congreso. Algunas de estas agencias no tienen relación con las zonas rurales. Las agencias buscaran convencer a las comunidades locales de adoptar los programas de Agenda 21 proporcionándoles millones de dólares en donaciones. La Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh escribiendo para Prensa Libre de  Canadá (Canada Free Press)  analizo el decreto y escribió, “establece un desenfrenado control federal en el área rural Americana así como en educación, suministro de alimentos, uso de la tierra, uso del agua, recreación, propiedad, energía y la vida de 16% de la población estadounidense.”

Grupos como el Tea Party, el anfitrión del programa de entrevistas Glenn Beck, organizaciones como Defensores de la Libertad, (Freedom Advocates), la Agencia de investigaciones Católica (Catholic Investigative Agency) y Soberanía Internacional(Sovereignty International) están trabajando duro para exponer los programas de Agenda 21, solo son unos pocos y hay mucho que hacer. Algunos gobiernos locales ya han tomado conciencia acerca de lo que Agenda 21  realmente es y se han retirado de ICLEI este año. La Junta de comisionados del condado Carroll, el condado de Montgomery en Pennsylvania y la ciudad de Edmond en Oklahoma todos  retiraron su participación.

Será difícil derrotar Agenda 21 porque idealmente requiere el cambio de las actitudes de más de 600 localidades independientes a través de los Estados Unidos, un presidente conservador podría revertir los decretos implementados, pero considerando que el Presidente Republicano  H. W. Bush fue una decepción que no se puede esperar demasiado en este ámbito. Si los republicanos toman el control en el Congreso podrían desafiar lo que Obama hizo al entregar este enorme poder al firmar la orden ejecutiva 13575 y prohibir Agenda 21 en los Estados Unidos. Por ahora, los activistas locales deben campear este problema, como lo mucho que ha hecho responsablemente  el gobierno de Texas, sirviendo y educando a las comisiones y a los consejos locales en el asunto. Agenda 21 es un tema tedioso y abrumador y hasta que pueda  explicarse de una manera fácil de entender para el estadounidense promedio de nuevo tome interés, será difícil devolverles el golpe.

 Traducido de: http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2011/07/02/agenda_21_conspiracy_theory_or_real_threat/page/full/

“Estamos al borde de una transformación global. Todo lo que necesitamos es la gran crisis adecuada.”

–David Rockefeller,

Miembro ejecutivo del Club de Roma

Leer más»

Fuente:

http://www.libertaddigital.com/espana/2012-11-20/perez-abellan-prim-murio-en-una-guerra-entre-masones-1276474755/

Información:

CRÓNICA NEGRA EN 'ES LA MAÑANA'

Pérez Abellán: Prim murió "en una guerra entre masones"

Tras descubrir que el general Prim fue estrangulado, Pérez Abellán aclara en esRadio algunos interrogantes sobre el asesinato.

ESRADIO 2012-11-20

El criminólogo Francisco Pérez Abellán ha explicado en la sección deEs la Mañana de Federico, Crónica Negra, el hallazgo por parte de la Comisión Prim del Departamento de Criminología de la Universidad Camilo José Cela que preside de la verdadera causas del asesinato de Juan Prim.

La versión oficial que había hasta entonces sostenía que Prim murió a causa de las heridas producidas por los disparos que recibió en una emboscada cuando volvía al ministerio de la Guerra. Sin embargo Francisco Pérez Abellán ha revelado tras analizar su momia que "fue estrangulado".

Pérez Abellán ha contado que esta comisión de investigación estaba buscando una respuesta a esta pregunta: "¿Prim murió en el momento en el que recibió los disparos o estuvo tres días muriendo en su lecho y se produjeron todos esos hechos que se recogieron en los periódicos de la época?".

Ha señalado que han "cogido un tema misterioso, necesitado de investigación porque nadie nos había contado esto nunca" y que en la Comisión Prim hay "un grupo de investigadores en los que están representados lo mejor de cada casa".

Francisco Pérez Abellán ha explicado que "en el primer reconocimiento a la momia todo el mundo se convenció a través de los médicos que los impactos recibidos en su cuerpo, especialmente el del hombro izquierdo, le dejaron fuera de juego". Por ese motivo ha indicado que "a lo mejor no había muerto en ese momento pero a raíz de eso no pudo hablar, no pudo andar ni escribir".

En esos momentos hay "una serie de decisiones que se le atribuyen" que no pudo dar debido al estado en el que se encontraba como, por ejemplo, "quien tiene que ir a recoger al Rey Amadeo I a Cartagena y otras muchas de vital importancia".

Pérez Abellán ha recordado que "fue el brigadier Topete" el que recogió al nuevo Rey en Cartagena y ha afirmado que "con Topete, Amadeo I estaba en manos de sus enemigos y de los enemigos de Prim y por eso fue Amadeo I 'El breve'".

El criminólogo ha apuntado que "esos enemigos le cortarán la hierba bajo los pies y son los que entran en la casa de Prim cuando estaba herido y los que asustaron a su viuda. Son los que tenían que haberle protegido y no lo hicieron".

Las fotografías que aclaran el crimen

Franciso Pérez Abellán ha comentado que "todo el mundo habla de Prim sin saber nada" ya que "hay gente que viene de fuera y escribe novelitas tratando de explicarnos la historia a nosotros cuando no saben el suficiente castellano para poder leer las obras históricas y mucho menos un sumario escrito a mano en el siglo XIX".

El criminólogo se ha quejado de que "hay una serie de novelistas que tenemos en España y que a veces dicen que son historiadores que no leen los documentos oficiales como el sumario de Prim, donde está todo".

En el sumario del asesinato del general Juan Prim "el fiscal Joaquín Bellando hizo un trabajo tremendo y unos jueces con valor, no como algunos de los que tenemos ahora, se la jugaron y fueron cesados cuando intentaron procesar a los auténticos asesinos".

Ha aclarado que en la Comisión que él preside "no sólo hay médicos, hay investigadores que dan clases en la Universidad Camilo José Cela de Investigación criminal" y que los considera "los mejores investigadores de nuestro país en el tema criminal". Estos investigadores "han visto las fotos y han dicho que es un rastro sin ninguna duda de una estrangulación".

Por eso "las fotos que ofrece Libertad Digital al mundo entero son de una calidad científica magnífica". Esas fotos de la momia de Juan Prim "están hechas por un fotógrafo científico especializado en este tipo de cosas" y "van a permitir a cada lector de LD decidir por sí mismo" y descubrir "la forma en la que fue asesinado".

Francisco Pérez Abellán ha explicado que en las fotografías se puede ver claramente cómo "se queda el arma del crimen marcada en la piel y cómo el cuerpo se ha contraído al perder todo el agua y por lo tanto es más pequeño de lo que era originalmente".

El asesinato del General Juan Prim

Federico Jiménez Losantos ha contado que "Prim era un gran militar, el presidente del Gobierno, el ministro de la Guerra y el jefe indiscutible de los ejércitos". También ha indicado que "además era el jefe político del partido liberal, que acababa de echar a los Borbones, y había hecho aprobar la instauración de una nueva dinastía en España para guardar la Constitución".

Por ese motivo el director de Es la Mañana... ha señalado que "Prim tenía detrás a media nación y medio parlamento y por eso hay jueces y fiscales que por razones de principio hacen una investigación muy honrada" sobre su muerte.

Pérez Abellán ha aportado que "era el hombre más importante de España" en ese momento y "era masón". El criminólogo ha afirmado que "la noche que murió tenía una cena en la logia" y los que intrigaron para matarle también eran masones por eso ha indicado que "fue una guerra entre masones".

El criminólogo ha explicado que "le pusieron tres trampas distintas"en los lugares por donde tenía que pasar para volver al ministerio de Guerra y "en las posibles rutas de huida". El complot estaba ideado "tres meses" antes.

"Los asesinos de Prim contrataron a todos los sicarios disponibles en el momento en España" ha contado Francisco Pérez Abellán que ha especificado que "una docena le esperaba en la calle Cedaceros, otra en la calle del Turco y otra en la esquina de Alcalá con la calle Barquillo".

Francisco Pérez Abellán ha indicado que "los asesinos vieron que no estaba herido en ninguna parte vital y por eso fue estrangulado" y que "hay cuestiones muy extrañas" como que "la policía estaba huida y el ministro de Gobernación, el supuesto delfín de Prim Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, también lo estaba y nunca quiso hablar de asunto".

Finalmente el criminólogo ha afirmado que "el tema de Prim nos explica gran parte de la historia de España". Además ha remarcado que "es un debate nacional" por lo que invita a todo el mundo a que lo discuta y aporte lo que pueda a la Comisión Prim de la Universidad Camilo José Cela que "está abierta a todo el mundo y todos serán bienvenidos".

Leer más»