¿LAS PIRÁMIDES SON OBRA DE UNA SUPERCIVILIZACIÓN?

Se usaron bloques de 100 y hasta 200 T. traídos de una cantera a 30 km. Están alineadas perfectamente con los puntos cardinales y el Cinturón de Orión. Los egipcios de esa época ni siquiera conocían el Hierro.

SOLUCIONES

Tú no puedes solucionar unos problemas con el mismo nivel de CONSCIENCIA que los creó. -Albert Einstein

EL HOMBRE QUE PIENSA POR SÍ MISMO

El hombre más peligroso para cualquier gobierno es el capaz de reflexionar... Casi inevitablemente, llegará a la conclusión de que el gobierno bajo el que vive es deshonesto, loco e intolerable. -H. L. Mencken

ESTRUCTURA SOCIAL PIRAMIDAL

Nuestro mundo está organizado de tal modo que una pequeña élite controla al resto a través de una jerarquía de jefes sobre otros jefes hasta llegar a los obreros en la base. El nivel de conocimiento separa a unos niveles de otros. -David Icke

GOBIERNO MUNDIAL O NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL

El objetivo de las élites es crear un gobierno mundial dictatorial, fascista, donde el Estado Policial es omnipresente y las libertades individuales no existen. -David Icke

NEGACIONISMO O ESCEPTICISMO CÍNICO

Condenar algo sin investigarlo previamente es la cota más alta de la ignorancia. -Albert Einstein

MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN

La Opinión Pública lo es todo. Si está a tu favor, nada podrá salir mal. Si está en tu contra, nada podrá tener éxito. El que moldea la Opinión Pública tiene un mayor poder que el que hace las leyes. -Abraham Lincoln

RESPONSABILIDAD PERSONAL

Tú debes convertirte en el cambio que quieres ver en el mundo. -Mahatma Gandhi

EL PODER DE LA PROPAGANDA

Debe hacerse tan popular y tan simple que hasta el más estúpido la pueda entender. A la gente se la puede convencer de que el Paraíso es el Infierno, o a la inversa, de que la vida más horrible es el Paraíso. -Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf"

REPETIDORES

La mayoría de la gente es OTRA gente. Sus pensamientos son la opinión de otros, sus vidas una imitación, sus pasiones una cita de un libro. -Oscar Wilde

CREENCIAS

En religión y política, la gente casi siempre las adquiere, sin examinarlas, de autoridades que tampoco las han examinado y que, a su vez, las han adquirido de unos terceros cuyas opiniones no valen UNA PUTA MIERDA. -Mark Twain

PIRÁMIDE DE PODER

Es fácil que una pequeña élite controle a una amplia mayoria a través de estructuras jerárquicas donde cada uno se está en su sitio sin moverse y sin interesarse nunca por nada. -David Icke

DEBER

La cobardía pregunta si es seguro, la conveniencia si es cortés, y la vanidad si es popular. Pero la Consciencia pregunta si es JUSTO. Y siempre llega un tiempo donde uno debe tomar una postura que no es nada excepto JUSTA. -M. L. King

911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

¿El atentado del 11-S fue ejecutado por el Gobierno en la Sombra de EEUU a través de infiltrados y aliados al más alto nivel en el ejército, los servicios secretos y los medios de comunicación?

¿MAGOS NEGROS CONTROLAN LA ECONOMÍA MUNDIAL?

¿El Dinero es el único Dios de este mundo porque lo controla TODO? ¿Los banqueros son los nuevos sacerdotes? ¿Los símbolos sagrados y ocultistas en los billetes atraen energías adecuadas a los fines de este clero?

¿EL 11-M FUE UN GOLPE DE ESTADO A FAVOR DEL PSOE?

Hay hechos documentados de sobra que demuestran que ciertos policías, miembros del servicio secreto, periodistas y jueces trabajaron para "dar un golpe de estado mediático" mintiendo, destruyendo pruebas o creando pruebas falsas.

¿ESTAMOS SOLOS EN EL UNIVERSO?

¿Otras especies y civilizaciones nos visitan con frecuencia? ¿Algunos son benéficos, otros son malvados, y la mayoría parece neutral o indiferente? ¿Los gobiernos cierran beneficiosos tratos mientras lo niegan todo?

¿NUESTRAS ÉLITES NO SON HUMANAS?

Con fama de endogámicos, herméticos, arrogantes, de "sangre azul", ¿nuestros líderes y reyes pertenecen a una raza distinta, con amplios y ancestrales conocimientos sobre la Realidad y lo Oculto?

¿NUESTROS POLÍTICOS SON TÍTERES?

¿Gente tan increíblemente estúpida e incompetente trabaja para "Amos Ocultos" que mueven sus hilos y a los que deben pagar los favores recibidos? ¿El "juego político" es una farsa para anestesiarnos?

¿SUPERTECNOLOGÍA EN LA ANTIGÜEDAD?

Es un hecho científico demostrable que ESTO no lo pudieron hacer tipos con lianas, troncos y herramientas de bronce. Tampoco podemos reproducirlo con nuestra tecnología actual.

jueves, 2 de enero de 2014

the End of Liberty of America (FULL VERSION!)

Vídeo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpGW4YrdHBE

Texto adjunto:

Subido el 20/05/2011
full version! watch it learn, nd teach yourself!


IF any of my videos helped you then please make a donation by Paypal to:

martinzwanenburg@hotmail.com

Please send the money as a "gift" and your donations are greatly appreciated!
every single penny wil be spend on fighting the elite and the illuminati! we need your support!
we can`t print money like they do,....
but we can spread the words out on internet!

The End of America

Vídeo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV5nEUdV5vQ

Texto adjunto:

Publicado el 16/08/2013
***Updated with the Latest Government and Economic Figures***

I believe that we as Americans are about to see a major, major collapse in our national monetary system, and our normal way of life.

Our government has been borrowing so much money (very often using short-term loans), that very soon, we will no longer be able to afford even the interest on these loans.

Today, the federal government has to borrow 46 cents of every dollar they spend...spending that stands at a staggering average of $435.8 million per hour.

But even these incredible figures don't tell the real story. Or even half of it...
  • Categoría

  • Licencia

    Licencia estándar de YouTube

Gerald Celente: Total Economic Collapse in Q1 2014

Vídeo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNWbt5snq2c

Texto adjunto:

Publicado el 25/10/2013
Gerald Celente breaks down CHASE Bank double speak and forecasts total economic meltdown in 2014.
http://NextNewsNetwork.com
http://Facebook.com/NextNewsNet
@NextNewsNet
http://bit.ly/Sub-to-N3
#NNN

Lindsey Williams - 3 Things That Will Happen Before The Financial Collapse Takes Place!!

Vídeo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW02e3xUldU

Texto adjunto:

Publicado el 25/10/2013
Lindsey Williams on End Time Talk Radio speaking with Barry Meyer on 22nd October 2013 talking about signs that will come before the collapse of the American economy.

Click Here To Hear My Previous Recap Of Lindsey's info. about the coming collapse: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KRKQo...

Click Here To Hear the entire interview:http://moneybagsworld.blogspot.com/20...

Click here to read The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney on MoneyBags World Blog:http://moneybagsworld.blogspot.com/20...

Poland Nationalizes Retirement Accounts!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hgQ9...
  • Categoría

  • Licencia

    Licencia de YouTube estándar

US civil war is coming - Financial Collapse Is Coming - Martial Law - Gerald Celente

Vídeo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbYXl42o1eQ

Texto adjunto:

Publicado el 10/10/2013
US civil war is coming - Financial Collapse Is Coming - Martial Law - Gerald Celente

MoD tightens security at American spy bases linked to drone strikes

Fuentes:

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/mod-tightens-security-at-american-spy-bases-linked-to-drone-strikes/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mod-tightens-security-at-american-spy-bases-linked-to-drone-strikes-9030864.html

https://www.google.es/search?q=MoD+tightens+security+at+American+spy+bases+linked+to+drone+strikes&oq=MoD+tightens+security+at+American+spy+bases+linked+to+drone+strikes&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8

Información:

MoD tightens security at American spy bases linked to drone strikes

Tuesday 31 December 2013
‘The Ministry of Defence is set to introduce “draconian” new powers to tighten security and limit access to US airbases in Britain implicated in mass surveillance and drone strikes, The Independent can reveal.
The measures, which include powers to arrest for offences ranging from taking photographs to failing to clean up dog mess, would be put in place through a little-known project to overhaul the by-laws surrounding military facilities across the country.
Among the sites where the new rules are set to be imposed are two US Air Force bases used as key communication hubs for clandestine eavesdropping.’

Exclusive: MoD tightens security at American spy bases linked to drone strikes

'Draconian' laws would help the US cover up illegal activities





The Ministry of Defence is set to introduce “draconian” new powers to tighten security and limit access to US airbases in Britain implicated in mass surveillance and drone strikes, The Independent can reveal.

The measures, which include powers to arrest for offences ranging from taking photographs to failing to clean up dog mess, would be put in place through a little-known project to overhaul the by-laws surrounding military facilities across the country.

Among the sites where the new rules are set to be imposed are two US Air Force bases used as key communication hubs for clandestine eavesdropping.

The Independent revealed earlier this year that RAF Croughton, near Milton Keynes, is used to funnel back to Washington data from a global network of spy bases in US embassies, including the secret Berlin facility alleged to have been used by the National Security Agency to listen in on the phone of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The base, which serves as a relay centre for CIA agent communications, is also at the centre of concerns that it may be used as a support site for US drone strikes operated from Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti against Yemeni targets.

Along with RAF Menwith Hill listening station in North Yorkshire, the base is understood to be one of Washington’s key intelligence facilities in Britain, although the MoD insists USAF staff at RAF Croughton “neither fly nor control any remotely piloted aircraft”.

Until now neither RAF Croughton, nor its adjacent site, RAF Barford St John, which is also used as a signal relay station, have been subject to military land by-laws, despite being military bases for more than 60 years. During the Second World War, Barford St John was used as a top secret test facility for Britain’s first generation of jet fighters. It currently hosts an array of transmitter masts maintained by US military personnel.

But the two bases now feature on a list of nearly 150 military facilities where by-laws are being introduced or revised amid criticism that the new rules are being used to impose unprecedented levels of secrecy around sensitive sites. Similar revised by-laws for RAF Menwith Hill and nearby RAF Fylingdales, a US radar station earmarked for use in Washington’s missile defence system, are expected to be produced in the coming months.

Jennifer Gibson, of the human rights group Reprieve, said: “These by-laws have been designed to prevent any transparency about what activities take place at RAF Croughton and Barford St John. There is strong evidence that Croughton plays a role in the US drone campaign. But instead of coming clean with the public, the Ministry of Defence has decided to help the US further by drafting draconian by-laws that give the military the power to arrest dog walkers who stray in the general vicinity of the base. It must be asked what is going on at RAF Croughton and elsewhere and why is the UK helping the US cover it up?”

Proposals for new by-laws for RAF Croughton and Barford St John were published earlier this year by the MoD. It is understood that up to 38 other military sites where no by-laws currently exist are also being reviewed. The new regulations designate an outer “controlled area” around each facility, where a wide-ranging list of banned activities applies, and an inner “protected area” with more stringent restrictions.
Among the 20 activities to be banned within the controlled area are camping “in tents, caravans, trees or otherwise”, digging, engaging in “any trade or business” or grazing any animal. Also among the offences, which can result in an individual being “taken into custody without warrant”, is a failure to pick up dog waste or causing damage to “any crops, turfs, plants, roots or trees”.

The list of 10 banned actions within the protected area includes a prohibition on taking “any visual image of any person or thing”.

The MoD insisted it is merely bringing up to date a disparate set of by-laws which were first introduced in 1892, and seeking to bring about a “layered” set of legislation which will increase public access to some military land.

The German interior ministry has pledged to raise in talks with London and Washington the revelations concerning the alleged eavesdropping on Mrs Merkel’s phone and the use of RAF Croughton.

Exemptions for breaking the rules which have applied previously have also been reviewed. The last set of laws drawn up for RAF Fylingdales in 1986 states that no offence is committed if it is “proved that an act or omission was unavoidable by the exercise of reasonable care”. The proposed new rules contained no such exemption. An MoD spokesman said the clause would be restored to the by-laws.

Lindis Percy, a veteran peace protester and founder of the Campaign for the Accountability of American Airbases (CAAB), said: “Byelaws have not been used around other bases for years and yet they are now being brought in for these locations. Why? Does this mean an expansion of both bases? As usual there is a cloak of secrecy thrown around these US occupied and controlled bases as to what they are planning.”

Many “critical” military bases are also already protected by measures in the 2005 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA), which introduced an offence of criminal trespass on bases, punishable by up to a year of imprisonment.

The MoD said it had ensured there was a “wide-ranging” public consultation in each location to be subject of the new byelaws. A spokesman said: “The Ministry of Defence is the second-largest public landowner in the UK and has a commitment to encouraging responsible safe public access across its land, where this is compatible with operational activities.”

Brainwashed by the cult of the super-rich

Fuentes:

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/brainwashed-by-the-cult-of-the-super-rich/

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/25/brainwashed-cult-super-rich

Información:

Brainwashed by the cult of the super-rich

Tuesday 31 December 2013
‘Last week, Tory MP Esther McVey, Iain Duncan Smith’s deputy, insisted it was “right” that half a million Britons be dependent on food banks in “tough times”. Around the same time, the motor racing heiress Tamara Ecclestone totted up a champagne bill of £30,000 in one evening. A rich teenager in Texas has just got away with probation for drunkenly running over and killing four people because his lawyers argued successfully that he suffered from “affluenza”, which rendered him unable to handle a car responsibly. What we’ve been realising for some time now is that, for all the team sport rhetoric, only two sides are really at play in Britain and beyond: Team Super-Rich and Team Everyone Else.
The rich are not merely different: they’ve become a cult which drafts us as members. We are invited to deceive ourselves into believing we are playing for the same stakes while worshipping the same ideals, a process labelled “aspiration”. Reaching its zenith at this time of year, our participation in cult rituals – buy, consume, accumulate beyond need – helps mute our criticism and diffuse anger at systemic exploitation.’

Brainwashed by the cult of the super-rich

Followers, in thrall to Harrods and Downton Abbey, repeat the mantra that the greed of a few means prosperity for all


Champagne
'We are invited to deceive ourselves into believing we are playing for the same stakes while worshipping the same ideals, a process labelled ­'aspiration'.' Photograph: Alamy
Last week, Tory MP Esther McVey, Iain Duncan Smith's deputy, insisted it was "right" that half a million Britons be dependent on food banks in "tough times". Around the same time, the motor racing heiress Tamara Ecclestone totted up a champagne bill of £30,000 in one evening. A rich teenager in Texas has just got away with probation for drunkenly running over and killing four people because his lawyers argued successfully thathe suffered from "affluenza", which rendered him unable to handle a car responsibly. What we've been realising for some time now is that, for all the team sport rhetoric, only two sides are really at play in Britain and beyond: Team Super-Rich and Team Everyone Else.
The rich are not merely different: they've become a cult which drafts us as members. We are invited to deceive ourselves into believing we are playing for the same stakes while worshipping the same ideals, a process labelled "aspiration". Reaching its zenith at this time of year, our participation in cult rituals – buy, consume, accumulate beyond need – helps mute our criticism and diffuse anger at systemic exploitation. That's why we buy into the notion that a £20 Zara necklace worn by the Duchess of Cambridge on a designer gown costing thousands of pounds is evidence that she is like us. We hear that the monarch begrudges police officers who guard her family and her palaces a handful of cashew nuts and interpret it as eccentricity rather than an apt metaphor for the Dickensian meanness of spirit that underlies the selective concentration of wealth. The adulation of royalty is not a harmless anachronism; it is calculated totem worship that only entrenches the bizarre notion that some people are rich simply because they are more deserving but somehow they are still just like us.
Cults rely on spectacles of opulence intended to stoke an obsessive veneration for riches. The Rich Kids of Instagram who showed us what the "unapologetically uber-rich" can do because they have "more money than you" will find further fame in a novel and a reality show. Beyond the sumptuous lifestyle spreads in glossies or the gift-strewn shop windows at Harrods and Selfridges, and Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop website, shows like Downton Abbey keep us in thrall to the idea of moolah, mansions and autocratic power. They help us forget that wealthy British landowners, including the Queen, get millions of pounds in farming subsidies while the rest of us take back to the modest homes, which we probably don't own, lower salaries and slashed pensions. Transfixed by courtroom dramas involving people who can spend a small family's living income on flower arrangements, we don't ask why inherited wealth is rewarded by more revenue but tough manual labour or care work by low wages.
Cue the predictable charge of "class envy" or what Boris Johnson dismisses as "bashing or moaning or preaching or bitching". Issued by its high priests, this brand of condemnation is integral to the cult of the rich. We must repeat the mantra that the greed of a few means prosperity for all. Those who stick to writ and offer humble thanks to the acquisitive are contradictorily assured by mansion-dwellers that money does not buy happiness and that electric blankets can replace central heating. Enter "austerity chic" wherein celebrity footballers are hailed for the odd Poundland foray, millionaire property pundits teach us how to "make do" with handmade home projects and celebrity chefs demonstrate how to "save" on ingredients – after we've purchased their money-spinning books, of course.
Cultish thinking means that the stupendously rich who throw small slivers of their fortunes at charity, or merely grace lavish fundraisers – like Prince William's Winter Whites gala for the homeless at his taxpayer-funded Kensington Palace home – with their presence, become instant saints. The poor and the less well-off, subject to austerity and exploitation, their "excesses" constantly policed and criminalised, are turned into objects of patronage, grateful canvasses against which the generosity of wealth can be stirringly displayed. The cult of the rich propounds the idea that vast economic inequalities are both natural and just: the winner who takes most is, like any cult hero, just more intelligent and deserving, even when inherited affluence gives them a head start.
We are mildly baffled rather than galvanised into righteous indignation when told that the rich are being persecuted – bullied for taxes and lynched for bonuses. The demonising of the poor is the flip side of the cult of the rich or, as a friend puts it, together they comprise the yin and yang of maintaining a dismal status quo. It is time to change it through reality checks, not reality shows.

Sandy Hook Police Report Contains No Evidence That Mass Shooting Took Place And Strengthens Notion That Event Was A Fabricated Hoax

Fuentes:

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/sandy-hook-police-report-contains-no-evidence-that-mass-shooting-took-place-and-strengthens-notion-that-event-was-a-fabricated-hoax/

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Sandy_Hook_Police_Report_Contains_No_Evidence_That_Mass_Shooting_Took_Place_And_Strengthens_Notion_That_Event_Was_A_Fabricated_Hoax/31582/0/5/5/Y/M.html

Información:

Sandy Hook Police Report Contains No Evidence That Mass Shooting Took Place And Strengthens Notion That Event Was A Fabricated Hoax

Tuesday 31 December 2013
‘The full police investigation into the alleged Sandy Hook mass shooting has finally been released to the public.  The release contains thousands of documents including hours of video footage and numerous photographs pertaining to the investigation.  As expected the content is heavily redacted which alone raises more questions about the official story.  Perhaps even more interesting is the content that hasn’t been redacted which by itself provides more evidence suggesting that this so-called shooting incident is a complete and total fabrication.’

SANDY HOOK POLICE REPORT 

CONTAINS NO EVIDENCE THAT 

MASS SHOOTING TOOK PLACE 

AND STRENGTHENS NOTION 

THAT EVENT WAS A 

FABRICATED HOAX

December 29, 2013




The full police investigation into the alleged Sandy Hook mass shooting has finally been released to the public.  The release contains thousands of documents including hours of video footage and numerous photographs pertaining to the investigation.  As expected the content is heavily redacted which alone raises more questions about the official story.  Perhaps even more interesting is the content that hasn’t been redacted which by itself provides more evidence suggesting that this so-called shooting incident is a complete and total fabrication.

First off, the timing of this release is highly suspicious.  If the police were looking to release this information at a time when as few people as possible would see the material, this was it.  The material was released this past Friday afternoon when many people were getting ready to leave work or were on vacation due to the end of the year holidays.  They also chose to release the videos in WMA file format which is one of the larger video file formats you could encode video into.  If they wanted as many people as possible to see the video footage they would be compressing these into smaller file formats.  Obviously they wanted the opposite to happen.

Some of the non-redacted material is very interesting.  For example, there are photos showing the clothing that the supposed shooter Adam Lanza was said to be wearing.  According to the official story Lanza was said to have committed suicide by shooting himself in the head.  When someone gets shot in the head it typically results in a bloody mess.  If you look at these photos there isn’t one speck of blood on any of his clothes.  Unless he stripped out of his clothing before killing himself it is impossible to believe that no blood stains would be found.  The same can also be said about the photos of the weapons Lanza allegedly used.  There is no blood shown on any of them including on the Glock hand gun that he would have most likely used to kill himself. 

Upon initial inspection of the video footage an extremely large portion of it is redacted.  While they might be able to justify redacting footage taken inside the building, it is hard to understand why large segments of footage taken outside of the building have also been redacted.  What could possibly be so graphic outside of the building requiring such large portions to be removed?  The only explanation is that there are things shown that would raise serious questions about the official story.  It is also worth noting that some of the footage shows police wandering around with very little sense of urgency.  Quite strange behavior from the cops considering what a traumatic situation was said to be taking place.

Photos allegedly showing Adam Lanza’s autopsy have all been redacted.  So there is no proof of Lanza’s dead body or that a proper autopsy was ever conducted on said dead body.  Lanza’s mental health records were also redacted from the report.  This is all of course assuming a person named Adam Lanza ever existed to begin with. 

Photos showing the inside of the school are heavily redacted as well.  There is no evidence shown that anyone was killed.  There are no pools of blood, no dead bodies or anything tangible shown that proves a mass shooting took place.  There are however lots of photos showing door handles and other unimportant areas in the building but that’s about it.  Conveniently a Connecticut State Law forbidding the release of photos or video showing homicide victims was passed this summer after pressure was brought forward from the families of this alleged tragedy.  The law puts Connecticut in a minority amongst the states with such a law on the books but more importantly the timing of this new law appears to have been passed to specifically cover up material relating to the Sandy Hook investigation.  This is why we are seeing a whole lot of nothing in the photos and video.

Considering there are numerous questions about the authenticity of the official story it has gotten to the point where it is in the public’s best interest to see some proof.  This event has been used as a way to justify a number of new policies including gun control initiatives so some real transparency is needed here.   Instead this entire thing reeks of a cover up.

Other Sandy Hook researchers have suggested that the photos showing the inside of the school are a bit strange.  Since these photos were taken a short time before Christmas, it is interesting to see that there appears to be a lack of Christmas decorations inside the school.  Usually elementary schools at that time of the year are plastered with Christmas decorations but in these photos there are few seen.  Whether or not this is proof that the school was staged is debatable but this is definitely something worth questioning. 

The photos showing the inside of the Lanza household are also strange.  Some of the shots look staged like pictures showing clean dishes in a sink and a lack of dust on the furniture.  There’s also a plant on the dryer despite the fact that we were told in a previous report that his mother washed Adam’s clothes daily.  If that was really the case, why would a plant be on top of the dryer?  It is just hard to believe that the home was ever truly lived in.  It is quite possible that the Lanza house was specifically staged and setup for these photos.  From what the photos show it looks like they only shot and released these photos to try and convince people that the home was lived in.  It seems like it would be extremely strange from a protocol standpoint to be taking photos of areas in the house that had nothing to do with the crime scene.  There are of course no photos showing Nancy Lanza’s dead body.  She was allegedly shot by Adam Lanza inside the house before he went on the supposed mass shooting spree over at Sandy Hook.  There’s obviously no proof that any of this happened based upon the photos they’ve released.

Many of the documents also show a number of redactions in which the names of witnesses are blacked out.  Why would the witnesses have to be redacted?  No matter the excuse for the redactions it is another way to cover up information possibly because the witness statements didn't quite match up with the official story.

These are just a few observations on the released material.  Undoubtedly there are probably countless other anomalies and questions but considering the size of material that has been made available, it will take some time to go through it all.  It should be interesting to see what other Sandy Hook researchers come up with as they plow through all of this information. 



To conclude, the material released shows absolutely nothing to prove that the Sandy Hook mass shooting took place.  Compare the information we have on Sandy Hook with this 2011 Associated Press report covering a mass shooting in a Brazilian school.  With the Brazilian school shooting there is surveillance footage showing people running for their lives, video of the gunman and even amateur footage of people bleeding from gunshot wounds.  This was made available just days after the incident took place.  We have seen none of this with Sandy Hook and a full year has already gone by.  Once again this shows that the Sandy Hook incident is nothing more than a gigantic hoax designed to push more gun control and other political initiatives.  The people who have participated in this fraud should be held accountable and put in jail.