Is GMO corn nutritionally equivalent to non-GMO corn? Monsanto will tell you the answer is a big 'yes', but the real answer is absolutely not. And the simple reality is that they are continuing to get away with their blatant misinformation. In fact, a 2012 nutritional analysis of genetically modified corn found that not only is GM corn lacking in vitamins and nutrients when compared to non-GM corn, but the genetic creation also poses numerous health risks due to extreme toxicity.
With the recent passing of the Monsanto Protection Act, there is no question that mega corporations like Monsanto are able to wield enough power to even surpass that of the United States government. The new legislation provides Monsanto with a legal safeguard against federal courts striking down any pending review of dangerous GM crops. It is ironic to see the passing of such a bill in the face of continuous releases of GMO dangers.
Non-GMO Corn 20x Richer in Nutrition than GMO Corn
The 2012 report, entitled 2012 Nutritional Analysis: Comparison of GMO Corn versus Non-GMO Corn, found numerous concerning and notable differences between GMO and non-GMO corn, none of which are particularly surprising. First, the report found that non-GMO corn has considerably more calcium, magnesium, manganese, potassium, iron, and zinc. Non-GMO corn has 6130 ppm of calcium while GMO corn has 14 -- non-GMO corn has 437 times more calcium. Non-GMO corn has 113 ppm of magnesium while GMO corn has 2 -- non-GMO corn has about 56 times more magnesium. Non-GMO corn has 113 ppm of potassium while GMO corn has 7 -- non-GMO corn has 16 times more potassium. Non-GMO corn has 14 ppm of manganese while GMO corn has 2 -- non-GMO corn has 7 times more manganese. http://www.infowars.com/analysis-find...